Three Dimensional Cinematography

February 1st, 2010 § 0

Hav­ing seen Avatar in “3D” this week­end just gone, I left the the­atre with my mind a wash of con­trast­ing thoughts.

First and fore­most Wil­helm Roll­mann (not the U-boat com­man­der) I salute thee. We have pro­gressed from his early tech­niques of cre­at­ing anaglyph images in 1853 via var­i­ous incar­na­tions to what we today know as three dimen­sional cinematography.

Any­one born pre 1990s will no doubt recall the card­board glasses with red and cyan lenses, oh what a joy they were! In some respects I feel it is a shame that they have improved to the stan­dard they are today with polar­iza­tion, there is a lack of what you or I asso­ciate with 3D images when we put on what could eas­ily be described as a cheap pair of sun­glasses. By all means do not take that state­ment in the wrong man­ner, I am utterly fas­ci­nated by the whole con­cept and the ever improv­ing methods.

Look­ing at my first expe­ri­ence with the new era of 3D I feel, being an avid film col­lec­tor I must com­ment on the fact that Avatar as a film even in two dimen­sions, leaves a lot to be desired to put it rather mildly. In 2154 would the US mil­i­tary still be using vocab­u­lary such as “Ooh-Rah”, wear­ing the same stereo­typ­i­cal com­bats, and still wear­ing their caps backwards?

Dear James Cameron,

Please can you leave the writ­ing, and prob­a­bly even the direct­ing of cin­ema, to those with con­sid­er­ably more talent?

All the best,

Steven

Now, back to the point of this arti­cle, 3D cin­ema as a whole. Bar­ing in mind that this is the first 3D piece of cin­ema I have seen of the new era, I am by no means an expert and fully appre­ci­ate there are a num­ber of for­mats on the mar­ket. I am writ­ing of my expe­ri­ence with RealD.

The con­cept has come on leaps and bounds, but as with ani­mated cin­ema in its hey­day, there are still many more steps to be taken to improve. One major flaw, that seems to be expe­ri­enced by many, is the blur­ring or ghost­ing of cer­tain ele­ments of the image, in par­tic­u­lar the mid­dle and far dis­tance. Is this is a side effect of the polar­ized glasses, I do not know, but for some it can be nau­sea inducing.

I do believe that with the right improve­ments it is going to be a won­der­ful expe­ri­ence, but until that day arrives, I will be stick­ing to my reg­u­lar two dimen­sional view­ing. My eye­sight will thank me, I am sure.

Plotting leaked postcode data

January 26th, 2010 § 0

Using the leaked post­code data that turned up on WikiLeaks:

UK gov­ern­ment data­base of all 1,841,177 UK post­codes together with lat­i­tude and lon­gi­tude, grid ref­er­ences, county, dis­trict, ward, NHS codes and regions, Ord­nance Sur­vey ref­er­ence, and date of intro­duc­tion. The data­base was last updated on July 8, 2009 and is over 100,000 pages in size.

You may be aware that in Sep­tem­ber 2009 this file appeared on Wik­iLeaks, at the time I thought lit­tle of it until I stum­bled across an inter­est­ing post by Paul BattleyNR1 Postcodes

He plot­ted his local postal dis­trict in alphanu­meric order using JavaScript and the HTML5 can­vas ele­ment sup­ported in most mod­ern browsers (you need not apply if using Inter­net Explorer). The whole process is done by using a Ruby script and a dataset in CSV for­mat that has been processed with dos2unix.

My main rea­son behind ask­ing Paul for the source was to have a try myself and in ret­ro­spect upon find­ing it to be Ruby based, as a prac­ti­cal method to help me bet­ter under­stand Ruby and how it works.

Click the image to view the ani­ma­tion. Bare in mind if you use any­thing such as NoScript you will need to allow my domain for the ani­ma­tion to work.

I may have a play around with new datasets, and alter­ing the colours at a later date. For now I have plot­ted NR1 with Paul’s orig­i­nal set­tings.

New images for mySQL lists

January 25th, 2010 § 0

I have been hav­ing a play around cre­at­ing some new images for cer­tain columns in items such as my DVD Cat­a­logue. Thought that it was worth shar­ing to get any opin­ions peo­ple may have.

Media Types

Film

Film

Television

Tele

Xbox360

Xbox360

Wii

Wii

Icons for all the rel­e­vant media types that I may list.

DVD Regions

Region Free

All

Regions 1-8

1–8

Region free in a con­trast­ing colour, whilst regions 1 through 8 are on white.

Film Rat­ings (as per BBFC classifications)

18 New images for mySQL lists

18

15 New images for mySQL lists

15

12 New images for mySQL lists

12

12A New images for mySQL lists

12A

PG New images for mySQL lists

PG

U New images for mySQL lists

U

Exempt/Unrated

E

I attempted to sim­plify, whilst keep­ing the colours sim­i­lar to the orig­i­nals. I have also put Uni­ver­sal and PG in cir­cles, to keep with the style.

Any addi­tional images I will cre­ate as and when they are required. Please give any feed­back you may have, it will be greatly appreciated.

Testing YOURLS/bit.ly

January 25th, 2010 § 0

What it says on the tin really, just test­ing some plu­g­ins and features.

GoogleSharing

January 21st, 2010 § 1

http://www.googlesharing.net/images/googlesharing.png

I came across an intrigu­ing project this morn­ing, called “GoogleSharing”:

Google­Shar­ing is a spe­cial kind of anonymiz­ing proxy ser­vice, designed for a very spe­cific threat. It ulti­mately aims to pro­vide a level of anonymity that will pre­vent google from track­ing your searches, move­ments, and what web­sites you visit. Google­Shar­ing is not a full proxy ser­vice designed to anonymize all your traf­fic, but rather some­thing designed exclu­sively for your com­mu­ni­ca­tion with Google. Our sys­tem is totally trans­par­ent, with no spe­cial “alter­na­tive” web­sites to visit. Your nor­mal work flow should be exactly the same.

Essen­tially, as they like to call it “a spe­cial kind of proxy”. Rather than giv­ing anonymity to all of your traf­fic, it sim­ply takes effect on any traf­fic between you and Google.

The fun­da­men­tal rea­son behind offer­ing such a ser­vice (which is also open source, so you or I can pro­vide alter­nate prox­ies) is to stem the amount of infor­ma­tion Google can col­lect about you, from every­day ser­vices like searches.

In a nut­shell any per­sonal infor­ma­tion is stripped and then all the remain­ing data, or iden­tity, is passed onto another user, and you obtain a new iden­tity, all via the proxy. This mix­ing of infor­ma­tion will make it nearly impos­si­ble for Google to gather the wealth of per­sonal infor­ma­tion it usu­ally does.

For a full, and quite frankly bet­ter expla­na­tion, in far more detail visit the home­page at http://www.googlesharing.net/

The (as of the time of writ­ing) exper­i­men­tal Fire­fox addon is avail­able directly here.